Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Investors Win Madoff 'Fictitious Profits' Appeal
Bernie Madoff's humongous Ponzi scheme failed, costing investors a fortune, because it was built on deceit. But the deception paid off for many years, delivering conjured-up profits to Madoff's customers.
Early in December, investors who pocketed billions in the six years before the scheme collapsed deflected a bid by Madoff bankruptcy trustee Irving Picard to claw back a big chunk of their “fictitious” profits. Affirming a lower court judge, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concluded that Picard's campaign to recover much of the investors' earnings is barred by a bankruptcy law provision that was designed, ironically, to minimize uncertainty in the securities markets. In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23032
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.