Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Preparation of UCC-3 termination statements may be thought of as ministerial work best left to paralegals or administrative staff. After long days and nights of negotiating and documenting a financing transaction, lenders, lawyers and business people may be too willing to rely on the diligence of others and not closely review the UCCs themselves. They do this at their peril. In a recent case, two large law firms and a major corporation failed to scrutinize a UCC-3 termination statement and may have inadvertently allowed $1.5 billion in indebtedness to become unsecured.
In that case, In re: Motors Liquidation Company, 755 F.3d 78, 86 (2d Cir. 2014), the Delaware Supreme Court considered the payoff of a “synthetic lease” by General Motors Corporation (“General Motors” or “GM”), which required several UCC-3s to be filed to terminate liens on synthetic lease collateral. However, inadvertently included in that batch of UCC-3 termination statements was one that terminated a UCC-1 financing statement ' referenced only by its eight-digit filing number ' that was the principal UCC-1 securing a General Motors term loan that was 10 times the size of the synthetic lease and wholly unrelated to it.
Background
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.