Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP's (Womble Carlyle) technology training and online learning programs were in need of an upgrade. The firm's overall program was originally designed around using local trainers in specific offices to assist with hands-on training and address individual lawyer technology challenges through traditional, classroom-based training methods. Even the onboarding of new talent was handled in the traditional way ' seat the new hire in a room for days and inundate them with firm applications, policies and procedures. But, unprecedented firm growth, heightened emphasis on developing lawyers' core technology competencies, and a need to streamline and automate existing e-learning processes led the firm to initiate a fundamental shift. As part of this core change, our firm outsourced its entire technology training delivery and reorganized around on-demand learning, distance learning and virtual coaching. Led by Lori Patton, the firm's Chief Learning Officer and me, Director of Technology Services, we pursued a new strategy: partnering with technology training and learning specialist Encoretech to develop and deliver the firm's new live distance training and coaching program.
Time to Challenge The Status Quo
With over 500 lawyers across 14 offices, our firm's trainers were challenged to cohesively support all staff, locally and remotely. Having physical trainers in certain locations favored those offices and local employee training needs, while hands-on training in non-trainer staffed offices was a bit more challenging, inefficient, and often cost prohibitive. In addition to resource challenges, we realized that while the old training model of sending attorneys to training classes to “learn Word or Excel” may work during a major rollout, it did not accommodate their busy schedules, nor mirror the way users retain knowledge and learn new skills.
The firm realized that technology, new processes and workflows, and new ways of engaging users in training would be the key to success, not increasing the number of tutorials and training sessions being offered in the “old” delivery model.
Tailored Training, Noticeable Results
While looking externally to help with this, we brought in longtime partner Encoretech who had just launched Encoretech's Training-as-a-Service (TaaS), its legal outsourced training and distance learning services offering. Leveraging its distance learning experience from the financial and corporate sectors, Encoretech set out to deliver an outsourced distance training model for legal that would utilize a team of distance learning specialists, leverage a learning management system (LMS), and afford the ability to offer custom live distance coaching, training and e-learning; all based on how users consume content and are best able to process it, when they need it, and in a format of their choosing. We spent a lot of time with Encoretech upfront, but also with a committee of select attorneys, paralegals, secretaries and executive staff to make sure this “alternative” approach would work for our firm and together mapped out a phased approach to executing our new “as a service,” outsourced training program. With the invaluable help of our then in-house training team, we phased Encoretech in over a three-month period. At the end of those transitional months, during which we used the time to get Encoretech up to speed with our nuances and communicate direction to the firm, we were live with the Training-as-a-Service model.
Currently, with the TaaS model in place, traditional law firm training is replaced with on-demand, “use-as-you-go” training and tutorials that busy lawyers and staff can access and utilize as needed. The content is delivered via the Web in live online classes, live one-on-one sessions and custom tutorials, all by an Encoretech team of distance trainers and content experts available at users' convenience.
To date, the firm has experienced various benefits from our decision to adopt a centralized learning model optimized for the learner. These include:
The Key to Training Success: User Engagement
Since the initial training delivery roll-out, our firm has been pleased to see a significant uptake in training participation from the group that was always the most challenging to reach ' our lawyers. With over 50% of them currently engaged in learning activities, this is a significant increase over participation levels of the past. Relevant, bite-sized learning modules have been the key ingredient. Lawyers are extremely busy and their time is valuable. Content must be relevant and the knowledge attained must allow them to serve existing clients, as well as seek new relationships with buyers of legal services in the middle market. Although participation has been very good, we are focused on increasing that percentage with our end-goal of having 100% lawyer engagement.
The ultimate goal in terms of our learning platform functionality is to have fully fleshed-out learning pathways for the practitioners and their support teams. To do so, we must continue to gain deeper insight into the specific training various practice groups need to serve their clients. Then, prove the value of that training through offerings that are effective because they are “just in time and just for them.” This will result in setting attainable goals through learning paths that are not tedious and counterproductive, but instead foster a desire for improvement. In this way, we can ensure that each individual has the technology skills clients demand.
To further this point, our firm is in the business of helping its clients succeed. Firm success is determined by client success and having practitioners with the technology skills to meet client demands for efficiency while remaining effective is extremely important. Womble's technology training program fits that bill. Training under this model is targeted and on demand: targeted in that it allows focus on an individual's weakest points, and on demand in that a person can skill-up quickly and move on. A case-in-point: Being efficient in technology usage while remaining effective and deeply engaged with clients is what the widely publicized Suffolk/Flaherty Technology Training Audit is all about. And, because of the firm's fully managed and centralized model backed by user acceptance and genuine thought leadership, Womble Carlyle is prepared.
Time to Challenge The Status Quo
With over 500 lawyers across 14 offices, our firm's trainers were challenged to cohesively support all staff, locally and remotely. Having physical trainers in certain locations favored those offices and local employee training needs, while hands-on training in non-trainer staffed offices was a bit more challenging, inefficient, and often cost prohibitive. In addition to resource challenges, we realized that while the old training model of sending attorneys to training classes to “learn Word or Excel” may work during a major rollout, it did not accommodate their busy schedules, nor mirror the way users retain knowledge and learn new skills.
The firm realized that technology, new processes and workflows, and new ways of engaging users in training would be the key to success, not increasing the number of tutorials and training sessions being offered in the “old” delivery model.
Tailored Training, Noticeable Results
While looking externally to help with this, we brought in longtime partner Encoretech who had just launched Encoretech's Training-as-a-Service (TaaS), its legal outsourced training and distance learning services offering. Leveraging its distance learning experience from the financial and corporate sectors, Encoretech set out to deliver an outsourced distance training model for legal that would utilize a team of distance learning specialists, leverage a learning management system (LMS), and afford the ability to offer custom live distance coaching, training and e-learning; all based on how users consume content and are best able to process it, when they need it, and in a format of their choosing. We spent a lot of time with Encoretech upfront, but also with a committee of select attorneys, paralegals, secretaries and executive staff to make sure this “alternative” approach would work for our firm and together mapped out a phased approach to executing our new “as a service,” outsourced training program. With the invaluable help of our then in-house training team, we phased Encoretech in over a three-month period. At the end of those transitional months, during which we used the time to get Encoretech up to speed with our nuances and communicate direction to the firm, we were live with the Training-as-a-Service model.
Currently, with the TaaS model in place, traditional law firm training is replaced with on-demand, “use-as-you-go” training and tutorials that busy lawyers and staff can access and utilize as needed. The content is delivered via the Web in live online classes, live one-on-one sessions and custom tutorials, all by an Encoretech team of distance trainers and content experts available at users' convenience.
To date, the firm has experienced various benefits from our decision to adopt a centralized learning model optimized for the learner. These include:
The Key to Training Success: User Engagement
Since the initial training delivery roll-out, our firm has been pleased to see a significant uptake in training participation from the group that was always the most challenging to reach ' our lawyers. With over 50% of them currently engaged in learning activities, this is a significant increase over participation levels of the past. Relevant, bite-sized learning modules have been the key ingredient. Lawyers are extremely busy and their time is valuable. Content must be relevant and the knowledge attained must allow them to serve existing clients, as well as seek new relationships with buyers of legal services in the middle market. Although participation has been very good, we are focused on increasing that percentage with our end-goal of having 100% lawyer engagement.
The ultimate goal in terms of our learning platform functionality is to have fully fleshed-out learning pathways for the practitioners and their support teams. To do so, we must continue to gain deeper insight into the specific training various practice groups need to serve their clients. Then, prove the value of that training through offerings that are effective because they are “just in time and just for them.” This will result in setting attainable goals through learning paths that are not tedious and counterproductive, but instead foster a desire for improvement. In this way, we can ensure that each individual has the technology skills clients demand.
To further this point, our firm is in the business of helping its clients succeed. Firm success is determined by client success and having practitioners with the technology skills to meet client demands for efficiency while remaining effective is extremely important. Womble's technology training program fits that bill. Training under this model is targeted and on demand: targeted in that it allows focus on an individual's weakest points, and on demand in that a person can skill-up quickly and move on. A case-in-point: Being efficient in technology usage while remaining effective and deeply engaged with clients is what the widely publicized Suffolk/Flaherty Technology Training Audit is all about. And, because of the firm's fully managed and centralized model backed by user acceptance and genuine thought leadership,
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.