Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Plaintiff Not Unfairly Surprised by Greater Detail in Expert Testimony
The Connecticut Appellate Court has affirmed that a party is properly informed of the substance of the opposing litigant's expert's expected testimony under Connecticut law if he is told the basic substance of that testimony, even if the testimony actually given in court goes into greater detail. Vitali v. Southern New England Ear, Nose, Throat and Facial Plastic Surgery Group, 2014 Conn. App. LEXIS 480 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 11/24/14).
To remove the benign tumor in the plaintiff's right parotid gland, the plaintiff's surgeon, Dr. Paul Fortgang, transected the facial nerve and then repaired it. After the operation, the plaintiff allegedly experienced difficulty smiling, raising her right eyebrow and closing her right eyelid. The plaintiff sued Dr. Fortgang and his medical practice for medical malpractice, and alleged that Fortgang did not properly identify and protect the facial nerve.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.