Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Business Crimes Hotline
NEW JERSEY
Government's Interpretation of FCPA 'Instrumentality' Withstands Another Challenge
On Dec. 30, 2014, Judge Joseph Ireans of the District of New Jersey denied a motion filed by defendant Joseph Sigelman to dismiss his FCPA charges on the basis that his conduct related to a private company, not a government instrumentality. Sigelman, a former executive of PetroTiger, Ltd., is facing prosecution for alleged payments made to an employee of Ecopetrol S.A., a Colombian energy company. The government claimed in Sigelman's indictment that Ecopetrol was an “instrumentality” of the Colombian government at the time of the alleged payments, thus making its employees “foreign officials” under the FCPA.
The government derided Sigelman's view of a “government function” as a “one-size-fits-all test” that defied the Supreme Court's direction in First Nat'l City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De Cuba, 462 U.S. 611 (1983), a case interpreting the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). In particular, the government repeated the warning of First Nat'l City Bank that “the concept of a 'usual' or 'proper' governmental function changes over time and varies from nation to nation.” In supplemental briefing, Sigelman argued that legal authorities related to FSIA are not relevant to the FCPA's definition of “instrumentality” due to the two statutes' differing language and purposes.
Judge Ireans dismissed Sigelman's motion without a written opinion, leaving the court's specific rationale for the dismissal unspecified and preserving the Eleventh Circuit's opinion in Esquenazi as the leading recent authority ' until the next challenge is raised.
'
NEW JERSEY
Government's Interpretation of FCPA 'Instrumentality' Withstands Another Challenge
On Dec. 30, 2014, Judge Joseph Ireans of the District of New Jersey denied a motion filed by defendant Joseph Sigelman to dismiss his FCPA charges on the basis that his conduct related to a private company, not a government instrumentality. Sigelman, a former executive of PetroTiger, Ltd., is facing prosecution for alleged payments made to an employee of Ecopetrol S.A., a Colombian energy company. The government claimed in Sigelman's indictment that Ecopetrol was an “instrumentality” of the Colombian government at the time of the alleged payments, thus making its employees “foreign officials” under the FCPA.
The government derided Sigelman's view of a “government function” as a “one-size-fits-all test” that defied the
Judge Ireans dismissed Sigelman's motion without a written opinion, leaving the court's specific rationale for the dismissal unspecified and preserving the Eleventh Circuit's opinion in Esquenazi as the leading recent authority ' until the next challenge is raised.
'
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.