Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Use of Premises By Decedent's Daughter Did Not Constitute Unauthorized Subletting Or Assignment
Skyline Terrace Cooperative, Inc. v. Ortiz-Robles
NYLJ 11/12/14
AppTerm, Second Dept.
(memorandum opinion)
In co-op corporation's summary holdover proceeding, the co-op appealed from Civil Court's dismissal of the petition. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that use of the premises by deceased tenant's daughter did not constitute an unauthorized subletting or assignment of the premises.
The proprietary lease for the subject apartment allows the co-op to terminate the lease in the case of “an assignment of this lease, or any subletting hereunder, without full compliance [with lease requirements]; or if any person not authorized ' shall be permitted to use or occupy the Apartment.” Before the proprietary lessee's death, her daughter moved into the apartment with her. When the proprietary tenant died, the daughter, who was also her executor, continued to live in the apartment. The co-op corporation then brought this holdover proceeding, alleging a violation of the lease. Civil Court dismissed the proceeding.
In affirming, the Appellate Term emphasized that the estate had never assigned the shares associated with the apartment, and that there was no evidence of a sublease. The court then noted that the proprietary lease permits use of the apartment by the lessee and the lessee's immediate family. As a result, when the daughter moved into the apartment, her occupancy was authorized, and her mother's death did not make the occupation unauthorized.
'
Use of Premises By Decedent's Daughter Did Not Constitute Unauthorized Subletting Or Assignment
Skyline Terrace Cooperative, Inc. v. Ortiz-Robles
NYLJ 11/12/14
AppTerm, Second Dept.
(memorandum opinion)
In co-op corporation's summary holdover proceeding, the co-op appealed from Civil Court's dismissal of the petition. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that use of the premises by deceased tenant's daughter did not constitute an unauthorized subletting or assignment of the premises.
The proprietary lease for the subject apartment allows the co-op to terminate the lease in the case of “an assignment of this lease, or any subletting hereunder, without full compliance [with lease requirements]; or if any person not authorized ' shall be permitted to use or occupy the Apartment.” Before the proprietary lessee's death, her daughter moved into the apartment with her. When the proprietary tenant died, the daughter, who was also her executor, continued to live in the apartment. The co-op corporation then brought this holdover proceeding, alleging a violation of the lease. Civil Court dismissed the proceeding.
In affirming, the Appellate Term emphasized that the estate had never assigned the shares associated with the apartment, and that there was no evidence of a sublease. The court then noted that the proprietary lease permits use of the apartment by the lessee and the lessee's immediate family. As a result, when the daughter moved into the apartment, her occupancy was authorized, and her mother's death did not make the occupation unauthorized.
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.