Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Eliminating eDiscovery Redundancy
As anyone in the e-discovery business can tell you, in-house and external legal teams are grappling with the collection, processing and review of ever-growing data volumes, and costs that increase in parallel. In the Advice From Counsel study released by FTI Consulting last year, a majority of respondents reported seeing data volumes exceeding 20 GB per custodian in their typical e-discovery matters. See http://bit.ly/1ymtnPa. Most participants also expected a continued upward trend in e-discovery data volume over the next few years.
In another recent study, e-discovery managers from the Fortune 1000 specifically flagged the issue of over-collecting data and collecting duplicate data as factors driving up e-discovery costs, compounding the challenge of ever-growing data volumes. See http://bit.ly/1yG4obB.
In response, the use of multi-matter repositories has emerged as a way to eliminate some of the data redundancy legal teams are facing. While it may not be practical to turn back the tide of data generated by employees as they go about their jobs, multi-matter repositories can maximize the value derived from data the first time it travels through the e-discovery life cycle, and avoid the time and cost incurred by having the same or duplicative data travel again and again through collection, processing and review.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.