Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Previously, we discussed the fact that some 84 million Americans work for companies that maintain ERISA-covered retirement plans that are divisible by QDROs, which guarantee the non-worker spouse (the non-owner) a share of the pension. Or the couple can opt for a buyout (sometimes called an immediate offset), by which one spouse trades away pension rights for another asset. Family practice lawyers are familiar with the differences between the defined contribution plan, such as a 401(k), and the traditional defined benefit plan, the old-fashioned company pension. But now, attorneys drafting QDROs must contend with a new type of retirement plan called a “cash balance pension plan” ' a hybrid that is not really the fish of a traditional defined benefit plan, or the fowl of a defined contribution plan.
Cash Balance Plan
A cash balance plan features elements common to both the defined benefit plan and the defined contribution plan. Though technically a defined benefit plan, its individual accounts, which sometimes permit lump-sum distributions upon termination, make the cash balance plan resemble a defined contribution plan. When companies began converting traditional defined benefit plans to cash balance plans, older workers protested that the new routine discriminated against those who were near retirement. Moreover, what was termed a “whipsaw” resulted in the calculation of a participant's account value when different rates ' one for compounding and one for discounting ' were applied.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.