Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Tacking Is a Question of Fact
Priority of use is a hallmark of trademark law. A party generally establishes rights in a trademark by using the mark in commerce before anyone else. Over the years, lower courts have recognized a doctrine called “tacking,” under which a trademark owner may “clothe a new mark with the priority position of an older mark.” The key to the tacking doctrine is that the new trademark must “create the same, continuing commercial impression” as the old mark; that is, the marks must be “legal equivalents.” Lower courts have split on whether a judge or jury should determine whether tacking is available in a particular case. In Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank, No. 13-1211, slip op. (Jan. 21, 2015), the U.S. Supreme Court considered the question and settled the circuit split, holding that tacking is a question for the jury.
Factual Background
Respondent Hana Bank began as a Korean financial entity, Korea Investment Finance Corporation, in 1971. That entity began using the name “Hana Bank” in Korea in 1991 and began offering and promoting a financial service in the United States called “Hana Overseas Korean Club” for Korean expatriates in 1994. Advertisements for Hana Overseas Korean Club included the name “Hana Overseas Korean Club” in English next to Respondent's “Hana Bank” mark in Korean. Later, in 2002, Respondent opened a physical bank in the United States under the English name “Hana Bank.”
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?