Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Editor's Note: When trying to make a reasoned decision about whether to settle or defend a medical malpractice claim, there are a number of things that should be taken into account. In this regard, author Kevin Quinley offers eight factors to consider, four of which were addressed in last month's newsletter: the defensibility of the physician's adherence to the standard of care; the scope of damages; the potential for uncovered damages; and the plaintiff sympathy factors. He concludes his discussion herein.
5. Court venue. Medical malpractice litigation is like real estate. Location matters. Is the case in state court or federal court? A defense bar perception is that the caliber of judges is higher in federal court than in state court. Many state court judges are elected. Often, the risks for defendants are considered higher in state courts. Moreover, not all jurisdictions are created equal in terms of jury trends and demographics.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.