Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The phone rings, and the CEO tells you she's planning an acquisition of a target that has operations in Europe and Asia. She's focused on the potential to develop technology 24-7 and get closer to the global customers. Of course, your job is to get regulatory approval and maintain compliance once it happens. As you start to consider the requirements of antitrust reviews, foreign investment restrictions, trade controls and data protection, some involving non-U.S. law, you suddenly find yourself paralyzed by one thought. How are you supposed to manage them all?
Many corporations are facing similar challenges as their international business expands. The legal regimes have become much more complicated. And many more countries have imposed regulatory requirements in recent years, such as European sanctions and China's anticorruption and antitrust/competition rules. As companies expand, the regulatory burden can become onerous. And compliance and legal departments are being asked to do more with less, making well-designed compliance programs all the more critical.
Here are tips to consider when designing or revamping yours.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?