Judicial genuflections to the rules of evidence are often encountered in published decisions. The evidentiary rules have been hailed as “the palladium of the judicial process” infringement upon which “destroys the vitality of that judicial process.”
A Child 's Attorney As Hearsay Conduit in Custody Litigation
The evidentiary rules have been hailed as "the palladium of the judicial process." Such panegyrics to the rules of evidence are quite warranted. Yet, sadly, in practice, fidelity to the rules of evidence, and particularly to the rule banning hearsay, is far less than it ought to be.
By
Timothy M. TippinsThis premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.
