Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
First Circuit: Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Recover for Allegedly Defective Product
In Kerin v. Titeflex Corp., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21057 (1st Cir. Nov. 4, 2014), the plaintiff owned a home with an outdoor fire pit supplied with natural gas through corrugated stainless steel tubing (CSST). Although CSST can fail when exposed to powerful electrical forces such as lightning, it is widely used and approved by both government and industry regulatory bodies. Even though the plaintiff's CSST had never caused a problem, he sued its manufacturer in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts for negligence and breach of the implied warranty of merchantability (the Massachusetts near-equivalent of strict liability).
Citing reports of 141 home fires that “involved” both CSST and lighting, the plaintiff alleged that his CSST was defectively designed because, in the event of a nearby lightning strike, it was vulnerable to puncture and fire, and the defendant had failed to warn of this risk. The plaintiff sought damages in the amount of his “overpayment” for the allegedly defective product or, in the alternative, the cost of remedying the alleged safety issue.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?