Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Creditors' Rights in Chapter 11: Use Them or Lose Them
The old adage “use it or lose it” applies at every stage of a Chapter 11 case. In the interest of finality, strict deadlines for filing claims, opposing motions, assuming leases, and performing myriad other tasks can impose onerous consequences on parties who fail to heed them. Nowhere is this seemingly harsh ' but essential ' reality more evident than in the ongoing saga of a group of three holders of gift cards, totaling $225.00 in value, issued by the now-defunct Borders bookstore chain. After nearly three years of litigation, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a district court order dismissing as equitably moot the gift card holders' appeals from an assortment of bankruptcy court orders, and expressly clarified for the first time that the doctrine of equitable mootness applies in liquidating Chapter 11 cases, not just reorganizations. In re BGI, Inc., f/k/a Borders Group, Inc., 772 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 2014). As a result, the three gift card holders, who waited until seven months after the bar date to attempt to file proofs of claim and move to certify a class of other gift card holders, and who never opposed confirmation or sought to stay the effectiveness of Borders' Chapter 11 plan, are simply too late.
Background
At its peak, Borders operated over 1,000 stores across the United States and Puerto Rico. Borders and several affiliates filed Chapter 11 petitions in February 2011, but were unable to locate a going-concern buyer and thereafter entered into an orderly liquidation. At the conclusion of Borders' liquidation in September 2011, an estimated 17.7 million gift cards were outstanding, with unredeemed balances totaling approximately $210.5 million, for an average unused balance of $11.89. Although the amounts may seem large, Borders' gift card program dated back to 1998, with several billion dollars of gift cards sold over time. A significant portion of Borders' unused gift card balances reflected “breakage” ' the unused portion of a gift card left over and often abandoned or not used after making a purchase for less than the full amount on the gift card.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.