Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Drug Company Dinner Invite Was Not Unsolicited Advertisement
U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill has dismissed a suit alleging Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals of Ridgefield, CT, violated the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by inviting about 40 doctors by fax to a “dinner meeting” to discuss “female Viagra.” The suit was filed by a physicians' group that considered the fax an unsolicited advertisement in violation of the TCPA. Congress passed the TCPA in 1991 to protect consumers from receiving unsolicited phone calls and faxes advertising products and services for sale. Under the law, unsolicited advertisements like these are prohibited unless the receiver and the sender already have established a business relationship. The court determined that the invitation was not an advertisement because there was no female Viagra-type medication available for sale at the time of the dinner, and no mention was made in the fax of any specific product. Thus, the communication could not be considered an unsolicited advertisement under the TCPA.
Stephen Nevas of the Nevas Law Group was not involved in the case, but as co-chair of the Media and Law Section of the Connecticut Bar Association, he had this to say: “Two things stand out about this decision,” he said. “First, Boehringer was not proposing a transaction or seeking to market a product. Second, the court is not willing to find a violation of law based on speculative inference.” Nevas continued, “It is reassuring that notwithstanding the laws at play which raise significant First Amendment concerns, the court has erred on the side of speech when it is not absolutely clear that a violation occurred.”
Drug Company Dinner Invite Was Not Unsolicited Advertisement
U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill has dismissed a suit alleging
Stephen Nevas of the Nevas Law Group was not involved in the case, but as co-chair of the Media and Law Section of the Connecticut Bar Association, he had this to say: “Two things stand out about this decision,” he said. “First, Boehringer was not proposing a transaction or seeking to market a product. Second, the court is not willing to find a violation of law based on speculative inference.” Nevas continued, “It is reassuring that notwithstanding the laws at play which raise significant First Amendment concerns, the court has erred on the side of speech when it is not absolutely clear that a violation occurred.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.