Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In bankruptcy, the debtor is entitled to reject (not perform) burdensome contracts. For franchise agreements that contain trademark licenses, the effects of rejection are decided on a case-by-case basis. Sometimes the licensees of the trademarks can continue to use the trademarks over the objection of the franchisor and sometimes not. This issue arose in the Crumbs Bake Shop case in connection with the sale of its assets.
The franchisees (called licensees) of baked goods retailer Crumbs Bake Shop Inc. can continue to use the Crumbs trademark and sell products under the Crumbs brand for the remainder of their licenses' terms, even though the retailer, acting as debtor-in-possession, had moved to reject the licenses following the court's approval of the sale of the business's assets, in In re Crumbs Bake Shop, No. 14-24287, Bankr. N.J. (Oct.31, 2014, Kaplan, M.). The licensees could elect, under 11 U.S.C. Section 365(n), to retain their rights under their respective licenses even though “trademarks” were not included in the Bankruptcy Code definition of “intellectual property.” In addition, sale of the retailer's assets pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sections 363(b) and (f) did not affect the rights of third-party licensees under Section 365(n). The court held royalties generated as a result of this use were payable to the retailer, because the agreements themselves had not been assumed, assigned, or rejected, and thus continued to be the retailer's property.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.