Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Of all the areas that our company reviews with law firms, the question of how to manage paper records ' both onsite and off ' is probably the greatest hurdle faced by many of our clients. For most areas of back-office operations not running optimally, firms can outsource or hire a new manager and typically solve the problem. This is not the case for paper records.
The drafting of a firmwide, long-term strategic plan for your records is much more difficult, especially in the offsite records contract area. Having contracts in place that will allow you to destroy stored files and overcome previously, poorly negotiated contracts in a cost-effective manner is a challenge, to say the least. This issue, coupled with the cultural hurdle to reduce on-site paper files and migrate to a digital world, are substantial to overcome. Add in the industry-wide fear held by attorneys to destroy paper documents, and the hurdles become even more considerable.
Three facets must be in place to drive your offsite storage costs to zero:
Can it be done? Absolutely. Can it be done cost-effectively? Absolutely, as long as you have a plan, the management and the contracts to support it.
The Plan
As with any plan, the first question is always, “where do you start?”
While a records retention plan should be in place to destroy documents, it is not necessary for putting the pieces in place to make this plan happen. What is nice about this process is that all three facets can be worked on simultaneously. However, in order to make it cost-effective, your offsite contracts must be structured properly.
Offsite Records Storage Contracts
A few years ago I wrote an article on offsite records storage contracts that created a little stir in the industry. It began as follows:
It is widely believed that the oldest legal document known to mankind is the Code of Ur-Nammu, created in 2050 BC by King Hammurabi. This is not entirely accurate. In truth, the oldest legal document known to mankind is the off-site records storage contract that was created in order to store the code off-site from King Hammurabi's palace. Rumor has it the Sumerians are still negotiating re-boxing fees.
Obviously a little humor there, but supposedly some offsite storage vendors were upset. In the subsequent years, many of the issues highlighted in that article (re-boxing fees for example) have been dropped by vendors (legal industry, you can thank me later). However, the basic nature of these agreements unfortunately still prohibit you from doing what you want to do: destroy old, antiquated records. The key to a records storage contract is getting cost-effective terms.
How does an eight-year ROI sound? This is the number of years the average firm has to wait to start saving money if it pays the permanent withdrawal fee, retrieves the box, deletes the records electronically and shreds the documents inside the box.
There are firms that want to start to destroy records that cannot do so. It is not because they don't have a records retention policy or the originals are not in digital format to be retrieved at a click of a button. The sole reason is that it is too expensive to destroy them.
Some firms unfortunately have gotten themselves into agreements that contain the following:
In order to put a long-term strategy in place, these clauses have to be addressed.
Get Competitive
First, get a request for a proposal. Getting great pricing and terms never happen when you deal one-on-one with a single vendor ' whether that single vendor is new or you are negotiating a new contract with your current vendor. You may get better terms and pricing than you have currently (which only means your current pricing and terms are weak), but not great pricing. The only way you will get the most competitive pricing and terms the market has to offer is to create a competitive situation, and the only way to do this intelligently is to solicit competitive proposals through a request for proposal process.
Know the Market and the Vendor
Even when you complete a request for proposal, most vendors will not put forth their most competitive terms unless the vendor is explicitly asked, or you are asking the decision-maker.
For example, certain vendors will waive permanent withdrawal fees if they consistently fail to meet the performance standards outlined in their contracts ' but these details are only revealed upon request.
Contract Negotiations: Just Say No
Off-site records storage is an extremely competitive market and the vendors will back-down on terms only if they are pressed ' and only if they know their competitors are involved. Prior to selecting your short list, create a list of deal killers and inform the business partners that they will not be allowed to participate in the final round unless they address them in writing. After this exercise, you will have a pretty good idea of the vendors who will be willing to negotiate a competitive contract.
The key components that must be in this new agreement are:
Digitizing On-site Records
Having a process in place to convert paper-based records, whether incoming mail or existing on-site records, to digital images is more than just the key to developing a strategic long term digital solution, it's the roadmap going forward. Since 50% of existing paper documents are in electronic format already, how do you handle the balance?
There are a number of software workflow solutions that can provide a comprehensive front-end portal to your document management solution (DMS). Some of the more popular ones are Accuroute, eCopy, Docsolid, and the basic functionality in your cost-recovery system. In some cases, the native scan function of the multi-functional devices is sufficient. All these workflow products, in way or another, allow you to take paper documents, scan them into digital format, profile them for your DMS, and either transfer them into your Records Management System or delete them at the appropriate time.
The advantages of digitalization are worth mentioning again ' instant access of documents, ease of disposal, and freedom from autocratic offsite records vendors and disaster recovery. Decisions must be made:
Where to start? Firms that opt to begin scanning newly opened files take the approach that the system for scanning client documents will be administered on the front end ' that is, scanning the documents for the open client files as the documents arrive, one-by-one, in the mail. This allows the building of digital files from the front end and allows the firm to ease into the scanning process.
What do you do with your current offsite files? Depending on what happens with your offsite contracts, you may want to scan them or leave them in paper format until you can destroy them under the guidelines of your records retention policy.
Do you do it in-house or bring in an outside vendor to oversee the operation? We have had clients handle it both ways and it depends on the availability of your in-house staff, their expertise and the desired timeline.
What about the cost recovery aspect? Many firms recover the cost of scanning; will this fall under the guidelines or not?
Records Retention: 'When?'
A firm's record retention policy answers the “when” question for law firms; that is, when can I safely destroy a document?
Some basic guidelines for your firm's retention policy are:
Conclusion
Getting out of the offsite records storage business and becoming “paperless” will not happen overnight, but the longest journey begins with the first step. There is absolutely no reason why your firm cannot be installing a front-end workflow solution to start the transition to digital records, positioning your offsite contracts to reduce your current costs and ending permanent withdrawal fees while your firm is defining their retention schedule. The whole point is to put a plan in place and get started.
Of all the areas that our company reviews with law firms, the question of how to manage paper records ' both onsite and off ' is probably the greatest hurdle faced by many of our clients. For most areas of back-office operations not running optimally, firms can outsource or hire a new manager and typically solve the problem. This is not the case for paper records.
The drafting of a firmwide, long-term strategic plan for your records is much more difficult, especially in the offsite records contract area. Having contracts in place that will allow you to destroy stored files and overcome previously, poorly negotiated contracts in a cost-effective manner is a challenge, to say the least. This issue, coupled with the cultural hurdle to reduce on-site paper files and migrate to a digital world, are substantial to overcome. Add in the industry-wide fear held by attorneys to destroy paper documents, and the hurdles become even more considerable.
Three facets must be in place to drive your offsite storage costs to zero:
Can it be done? Absolutely. Can it be done cost-effectively? Absolutely, as long as you have a plan, the management and the contracts to support it.
The Plan
As with any plan, the first question is always, “where do you start?”
While a records retention plan should be in place to destroy documents, it is not necessary for putting the pieces in place to make this plan happen. What is nice about this process is that all three facets can be worked on simultaneously. However, in order to make it cost-effective, your offsite contracts must be structured properly.
Offsite Records Storage Contracts
A few years ago I wrote an article on offsite records storage contracts that created a little stir in the industry. It began as follows:
It is widely believed that the oldest legal document known to mankind is the Code of Ur-Nammu, created in 2050 BC by King Hammurabi. This is not entirely accurate. In truth, the oldest legal document known to mankind is the off-site records storage contract that was created in order to store the code off-site from King Hammurabi's palace. Rumor has it the Sumerians are still negotiating re-boxing fees.
Obviously a little humor there, but supposedly some offsite storage vendors were upset. In the subsequent years, many of the issues highlighted in that article (re-boxing fees for example) have been dropped by vendors (legal industry, you can thank me later). However, the basic nature of these agreements unfortunately still prohibit you from doing what you want to do: destroy old, antiquated records. The key to a records storage contract is getting cost-effective terms.
How does an eight-year ROI sound? This is the number of years the average firm has to wait to start saving money if it pays the permanent withdrawal fee, retrieves the box, deletes the records electronically and shreds the documents inside the box.
There are firms that want to start to destroy records that cannot do so. It is not because they don't have a records retention policy or the originals are not in digital format to be retrieved at a click of a button. The sole reason is that it is too expensive to destroy them.
Some firms unfortunately have gotten themselves into agreements that contain the following:
In order to put a long-term strategy in place, these clauses have to be addressed.
Get Competitive
First, get a request for a proposal. Getting great pricing and terms never happen when you deal one-on-one with a single vendor ' whether that single vendor is new or you are negotiating a new contract with your current vendor. You may get better terms and pricing than you have currently (which only means your current pricing and terms are weak), but not great pricing. The only way you will get the most competitive pricing and terms the market has to offer is to create a competitive situation, and the only way to do this intelligently is to solicit competitive proposals through a request for proposal process.
Know the Market and the Vendor
Even when you complete a request for proposal, most vendors will not put forth their most competitive terms unless the vendor is explicitly asked, or you are asking the decision-maker.
For example, certain vendors will waive permanent withdrawal fees if they consistently fail to meet the performance standards outlined in their contracts ' but these details are only revealed upon request.
Contract Negotiations: Just Say No
Off-site records storage is an extremely competitive market and the vendors will back-down on terms only if they are pressed ' and only if they know their competitors are involved. Prior to selecting your short list, create a list of deal killers and inform the business partners that they will not be allowed to participate in the final round unless they address them in writing. After this exercise, you will have a pretty good idea of the vendors who will be willing to negotiate a competitive contract.
The key components that must be in this new agreement are:
Digitizing On-site Records
Having a process in place to convert paper-based records, whether incoming mail or existing on-site records, to digital images is more than just the key to developing a strategic long term digital solution, it's the roadmap going forward. Since 50% of existing paper documents are in electronic format already, how do you handle the balance?
There are a number of software workflow solutions that can provide a comprehensive front-end portal to your document management solution (DMS). Some of the more popular ones are Accuroute, eCopy, Docsolid, and the basic functionality in your cost-recovery system. In some cases, the native scan function of the multi-functional devices is sufficient. All these workflow products, in way or another, allow you to take paper documents, scan them into digital format, profile them for your DMS, and either transfer them into your Records Management System or delete them at the appropriate time.
The advantages of digitalization are worth mentioning again ' instant access of documents, ease of disposal, and freedom from autocratic offsite records vendors and disaster recovery. Decisions must be made:
Where to start? Firms that opt to begin scanning newly opened files take the approach that the system for scanning client documents will be administered on the front end ' that is, scanning the documents for the open client files as the documents arrive, one-by-one, in the mail. This allows the building of digital files from the front end and allows the firm to ease into the scanning process.
What do you do with your current offsite files? Depending on what happens with your offsite contracts, you may want to scan them or leave them in paper format until you can destroy them under the guidelines of your records retention policy.
Do you do it in-house or bring in an outside vendor to oversee the operation? We have had clients handle it both ways and it depends on the availability of your in-house staff, their expertise and the desired timeline.
What about the cost recovery aspect? Many firms recover the cost of scanning; will this fall under the guidelines or not?
Records Retention: 'When?'
A firm's record retention policy answers the “when” question for law firms; that is, when can I safely destroy a document?
Some basic guidelines for your firm's retention policy are:
Conclusion
Getting out of the offsite records storage business and becoming “paperless” will not happen overnight, but the longest journey begins with the first step. There is absolutely no reason why your firm cannot be installing a front-end workflow solution to start the transition to digital records, positioning your offsite contracts to reduce your current costs and ending permanent withdrawal fees while your firm is defining their retention schedule. The whole point is to put a plan in place and get started.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.