Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Raising the Stakes
The government has become increasingly aggressive in pursuing criminal claims not only against corporations, but also against in-house counsel and compliance personnel, for conduct once treated almost exclusively as civil. This trend creates situations in which a judgment call on the part of an in-house attorney or compliance officer could create real and dire personal consequences. Most recently, the U.S. Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network imposed a $1 million civil penalty against a money services industry compliance officer as a result of a purported failure to ensure his company's compliance with anti-money laundering laws.
The False Claims Act
The False Claims Act (FCA) provides an ideal case study for this phenomenon, as it is increasingly being used in this context. Under the FCA, if a person knowingly presents a false claim to the government, makes a false statement to the government, or influences another person to do either, and such fraudulent representations were made for the purposes of obtaining compensation from the government, the government can hold that person civilly and criminally liable, by combining it with ancillary criminal statutes. 31 U.S.C. ” 3729(a)(1)(A), (B). The FCA is unique in that it also allows private citizens to file suit for violations on behalf of the government. This type of suit is known as a “qui tam” action, and the private individual who initiates the filing is known as a “ relator.” 31 U.S.C. ” 3729, et seq.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.