Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A former Facebook employee is suing the company for gender discrimination and harassment, claiming her supervisor belittled her at work and asked why she 'did not just stay home and take care of her child.'
Chia Hong, who worked for Facebook Inc. from June 2010 to October 2013, is represented by San Francisco employment firm Lawless & Lawless, one of two firms representing Ellen Pao in a'gender bias trial'against Silicon Valley venture-capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. That case has sparked nationwide media coverage and drawn attention to the low numbers of women in the venture-capital and tech industries.
Hong accuses supervisor Anil Wilson of ignoring her opinions and input during group meetings in which she was either the only woman or one of very few women present. She claims Wilson admonished her for taking one personal day a month to volunteer at her child's school, even though that time was allowed under company policy. And Hong says Wilson, who is listed as a defendant in the complaint filed in San Mateo Superior Court, ordered her to organize parties and serve drinks to male colleagues, which was not part of her job description, nor was it asked of the men.
The'complaint'also accuses Facebook of discriminating against and harassing Hong because she is Taiwanese.
A Facebook spokeswoman denied the accusations.
'We work extremely hard on issues related to diversity, gender and equality, and we believe we've made progress,' the spokeswoman wrote in an e-mail. 'In this case we have substantive disagreements on the facts, and we believe the record shows the employee was treated fairly.'
Hong was hired as a program manager for Facebook, and became a technology partner in 2012, according to her complaint. She received positive performance evaluations roughly every six months during her employment, but was replaced by a less qualified, less experienced man, Hong's lawyers wrote. When Hong complained about the discrimination and harassment, she says her supervisors retaliated by giving her unwarranted negative feedback in a performance evaluation. Facebook eventually fired Hong in October 2013.
According to the suit, Wilson told Hong 'he had heard she was an 'order taker,' by which he meant that she did not exercise independent discretion in the execution of her job duties.' She was also told she was not integrated into the team because, as a woman of Taiwanese descent, she 'looks different and talks differently than other team members,' Hong's lawyers wrote.
Hong is seeking punitive damages and injunctive relief.
'Plaintiff suffered severe mental distress, suffering and anguish as a legal result of defendants' outrageous conduct,' the suit states, 'reacting to her discharge with humiliation, embarrassment, anger, disappointment and worry.'
Marisa Kendall writes for'The Recorder, the San Francisco-based ALM sibling publication of Internet Law & Strategy. She can be reached at [email protected].
'
'
A former Facebook employee is suing the company for gender discrimination and harassment, claiming her supervisor belittled her at work and asked why she 'did not just stay home and take care of her child.'
Chia Hong, who worked for
Hong accuses supervisor Anil Wilson of ignoring her opinions and input during group meetings in which she was either the only woman or one of very few women present. She claims Wilson admonished her for taking one personal day a month to volunteer at her child's school, even though that time was allowed under company policy. And Hong says Wilson, who is listed as a defendant in the complaint filed in San Mateo Superior Court, ordered her to organize parties and serve drinks to male colleagues, which was not part of her job description, nor was it asked of the men.
The'complaint'also accuses Facebook of discriminating against and harassing Hong because she is Taiwanese.
A Facebook spokeswoman denied the accusations.
'We work extremely hard on issues related to diversity, gender and equality, and we believe we've made progress,' the spokeswoman wrote in an e-mail. 'In this case we have substantive disagreements on the facts, and we believe the record shows the employee was treated fairly.'
Hong was hired as a program manager for Facebook, and became a technology partner in 2012, according to her complaint. She received positive performance evaluations roughly every six months during her employment, but was replaced by a less qualified, less experienced man, Hong's lawyers wrote. When Hong complained about the discrimination and harassment, she says her supervisors retaliated by giving her unwarranted negative feedback in a performance evaluation. Facebook eventually fired Hong in October 2013.
According to the suit, Wilson told Hong 'he had heard she was an 'order taker,' by which he meant that she did not exercise independent discretion in the execution of her job duties.' She was also told she was not integrated into the team because, as a woman of Taiwanese descent, she 'looks different and talks differently than other team members,' Hong's lawyers wrote.
Hong is seeking punitive damages and injunctive relief.
'Plaintiff suffered severe mental distress, suffering and anguish as a legal result of defendants' outrageous conduct,' the suit states, 'reacting to her discharge with humiliation, embarrassment, anger, disappointment and worry.'
Marisa Kendall writes for'The Recorder, the San Francisco-based ALM sibling publication of Internet Law & Strategy. She can be reached at [email protected].
'
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.