Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

ABI Bankruptcy Reform

By Randall Klein and Prisca Kim
April 02, 2015

When Congress enacted the 1978 Bankruptcy Code, two competing groups of lawyers and academics squared off: those who favored restructuring opportunities for debtors by restricting the scope of secured lender rights and remedies; and those who favored the expansion and protection of commercial lending laws. ( See Kronman, The Treatment of Security Interests in After-Acquired Property Under the Proposed Bankruptcy Act, 124 U. Pa. L. Rev . 110-111 (1975)). Under state law, a broad security interest could give a secured creditor a lien on all future, after-acquired collateral. But the tension focused on whether to allow a secured creditor to improve its position with new property acquired after the bankruptcy case. The result was the broad mandate of Section 552 of the Bankruptcy Code: A prepetition lender with a lien on an asset enjoys a post-petition lien on the proceeds of that asset.

This rule fit well with the asset-based lending practices in 1978. For example, a prepetition lender's lien on a book publisher's inventory prepetition would continue post-petition with respect to accounts generated from the sale of such inventory and the eventual cash payment when received by the debtor. If that cash was then used to purchase all of the raw materials for the production of new books, the lender's lien would attach to those new books and all of the resulting accounts and cash. However, if that cash was used to purchase only half of the raw materials and the other half was purchased with post-petition trade credit, the proceeds of the finished goods would be allocated based on the “equities” of the case. Thus, because asset-based lending was the predominant form of secured lending in 1978, the Bankruptcy Code requirement for an equitable sharing of proceeds between secured and unsecured components was relatively uncontroversial.

But after 1978, borrowers began to obtain a fundamentally different type of secured loan based upon the aggregate value of the assets as a going concern ' cash flow lending. Companies would be bought and sold as going concerns for purchase prices tied to multiples of EBITDA. Lenders would provide financing based on a fraction of the purchase price secured by liens on substantially all of the purchased assets. Some lenders would offer cheaper financing in exchange for first lien priority and other lenders, sometimes in multiple tranches, would charge incrementally higher interest for second or third lien priority to account for the additional risk that the collateral would be insufficient to satisfy their loans after paying the lenders with higher priority. All of these lenders assumed, of course, that the blanket lien on substantially all of the assets would be protected during bankruptcy, such that the proceeds from the sale of a company as a going concern would first be applied to reduce the secured debt in the order of priority and any residual proceeds would be applied towards the unsecured claims (e.g., trade creditor claims).

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.