Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Twenty years ago, few lawyers would have thought the notion of legal competency would come to include understanding and advising on technical issues surrounding the discovery of electronic information. In today's digital age, however, lawyers must be both legally and technically savvy to competently represent their clients. While this might sound like common sense, the reality playing out in today's courtrooms is that many lawyers are struggling to adequately advise their clients on e-discovery issues.
This reality was highlighted in a new survey published by Exterro in February, “Federal Judges Survey: E-Discovery Best Practices and Trends.” In the survey, we collected responses from 22 of the most influential and well-versed federal judges on e-discovery issues. The results and associated comments provide a stark view into the judiciary's views on e-discovery competency, e-discovery trends to be aware of in the future and the need for attorneys to improve their e-discovery acumen.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.