Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As health care options continue to evolve, there has been a proliferation of high-deductible plans with the most popular being a health savings accounts (HSA). This plan takes advantage of the unique tax rules created by the IRS to maximize pre-tax contributions and appreciation on investments made within the account.
An HSA is a hybrid savings and investment account allowing the participant to save money in a traditional savings account, as well as investment in money market accounts or mutual funds through the HSA's managing bank. IRS rules allow for participants to reduce their income through pre-tax contributions, while employer contributions are not considered taxable income to the participant. Interest and earnings on the contributions accumulate tax free and the funds do not expire unlike other flexible savings accounts. When the participant begins taking distributions, the distributions are also tax free, provided they are used for “qualified medical expenses,” which can cover a wide range of expenditures.
Perhaps as important as the tax ramifications is that these accounts survive any change of employment or change of medical plan. The plan, once opened, is an asset of the participant, though continued participation in a high-deductible plan is required to continue making contributions. The 2014 annual contribution limit for a family plan is $6,550.00, even if both spouses maintain their own separate HSAs. The survivability of the plan also means that these accounts can be divided between spouses and have the potential for post-separation appreciation on the accounts.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.