Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Less than a decade ago, employers large and small would typically evaluate and hire potential employees on the basis of some fairly standard assessment tools: job applications and/or resumes; in-person interviews; personal and professional references; and transcripts or test scores.
Depending on the sensitive nature of the job opportunity, an employer might have dug deeper into an applicant's background; a criminal background and/or credit check could aid the employers in deciding whether the new employee at the till, supervising small children or inputting confidential medical data, was indeed trustworthy.
Today, however, employers have an additional source of information at their disposal thanks to the advent and prolific use of social media by prospective employees. (An estimated 1.35 billion users access Facebook on a monthly basis. As of December 2014, Instagram and Twitter boast 300 million and 284 million monthly users, respectively. See, John Constine, “Instagram Hits 300 Million Monthly Users to Surpass Twitter, Keeps It Real With Verified Badges,” TechCrunch, Dec. 10, 2014). Popular social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn, among others, can provide an employer with a unique and very clear peephole into the personal life of an applicant that might otherwise appear perfect “on paper.” Because a qualified job candidate may not have considered his future job prospects when he posted lewd Mardi Gras photos back in 2009, or took to Twitter to rail against President Obama in 2012, a quick check of social media by a recruitment manager could sink an otherwise certain offer of employment.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.