Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Terminating Same-Sex Partnerships

By Laurence J. Cutler and Julie R. Katz
April 02, 2015

Ending a romantic relationship is always difficult and presents various practical issues, some of which may include support, distribution of assets and custody. The issues that heterosexual couples face when ending a relationship are even more complicated for same-sex couples. The extent of these problems varies by state, depending on each state's recognition of same-sex relationships.

There are three tiers of legally recognized same-sex relationships: Domestic Partnerships, Civil Unions and Marriage. The rights and protections afforded by each of these tiers vary by state, and not all states recognize each of the three tiers. Generally, Domestic Partnerships afford couples the least benefits and protections, and are not recognized by other states that do not permit these partnerships. Civil Unions afford couples nearly all of the same state benefits and protections as married, heterosexual couples, but do not provide for the same Federal benefits or protections. Like Domestic Partnerships, Civil Unions are generally not recognized by other states that do not permit Civil Unions. Same-sex marriage provides couples with the most benefits and automatically conveys couples the same Federal rights and protections as heterosexual marriages.

Jurisdiction

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.