Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed that former Universal Wrestling Federation wrestler Steve “Wild Thing” Ray's state law claims, over ESPN's re-telecast of his 1990s matches, were preempted by federal copyright law. Ray v. ESPN Inc., 14-2117.
The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri ruled that Ray's “complaints are based solely on ESPN airing video recordings depicting him in a 'work of authorship,' which is plainly encompassed by copyright law.” But on appeal, Ray argued his state law claims over use of his likeness were the “focal point of this case.”
The Eighth Circuit determined, however: “ESPN did not use Ray's likeness or name in an advertisement without his permission to promote its commercial products, and, as the district court correctly noted, Ray's 'likenesses could not be detached from the copyrighted performances that were contained in the films.' Consequently, Ray's attempts on appeal to recast his claims to evade copyright preemption are unavailing.”
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed that former Universal Wrestling Federation wrestler Steve “Wild Thing” Ray's state law claims, over ESPN's re-telecast of his 1990s matches, were preempted by federal copyright law. Ray v.
The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri ruled that Ray's “complaints are based solely on ESPN airing video recordings depicting him in a 'work of authorship,' which is plainly encompassed by copyright law.” But on appeal, Ray argued his state law claims over use of his likeness were the “focal point of this case.”
The Eighth Circuit determined, however: “ESPN did not use Ray's likeness or name in an advertisement without his permission to promote its commercial products, and, as the district court correctly noted, Ray's 'likenesses could not be detached from the copyrighted performances that were contained in the films.' Consequently, Ray's attempts on appeal to recast his claims to evade copyright preemption are unavailing.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.