Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When an owner engages an individual as its exclusive listing broker to sell or lease his or her real estate, it is important for both sides to fully understand the commission obligations during the term of the listing, as well as any post-agreement protection granted to broker for its efforts during the listing term. One of the most significant and often negotiated terms of the listing agreement is what's known as the “tail period.” It is a standard clause in a listing agreement that requires the broker to register certain parties or transactions and a period of time during which the broker shall be protected and recognized as the broker for the transaction, entitled to be paid its commission pursuant to the listing agreement.
The tail period needs to be clearly defined, since the interests of the owner/seller and the broker appear to differ ' the owner may want the tail period limited as much as possible, in parties and in time, while the broker stands to benefit more from a broad list of parties continuing as long as possible. Although everyone expects that the deal will work out for the best during the listing period, the lawyers must prepare for the worst, protect their clients as best as possible, and make them aware of the issues and risks, without getting in the way of the business deal. It is very important to be clear with the post-agreement language at the start, because once the listing has been terminated or expired without being extended, the parties may not have the same positive feelings about each other that they had prior to negotiating the listing agreement, and any ambiguity can lead to an unnecessary dispute.
The tail period has two major components:
Who Is Included in the Tail?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?