Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Expert Barred from Testifying About Harm from Accutane Use
In a ruling likely to impact thousands of pending cases, a New Jersey judge has barred Accutane plaintiffs from presenting expert testimony that the drug causes Crohn's disease. The testimony failed to meet the standards of scientific reliability required by New Jersey Rule of Evidence 702, Atlantic County Superior Court Judge Nelson Johnson said in a decision made public Feb. 23. It is one thing to “stand alone in the world of science by advancing a hypothesis that others do not accept,” but “quite another thing to advance a hypothesis that can only be supported by disregarding valid scientific research,” Johnson said.
There are more than 6,700 lawsuits consolidated before Johnson on a multicounty litigation docket alleging that Accutane, an acne medication made by Roche Laboratories, caused harmful side effects such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), ulcerative colitis, birth defects and extreme depression.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?