Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Lindsay Conner is your consummate Hollywood lawyer, but for one thing. Lately, the Manatt, Phelps & Phillips partner has been working on deals between his domestic film industry clients and Chinese film studios and distributors. The two groups were notoriously at odds for years over intellectual property and piracy issues. China was an open market for DVDs of pirated new Hollywood releases, and the country's leaders were seemingly overwhelmed or unwilling to do anything to curb the billion-dollar traffic.
But Hollywood, ever on the lookout for new audiences (and, culture analysts would say, new ways to spread American culture into formerly resistant markets), now sees the Chinese as a giant consumer of its blockbusters ' in a legitimate way.
What's in it for the Chinese companies? After all, China and the former colony of Hong Kong have a long history of filmmaking. In a few words, they're looking for expertise, both in how Hollywood studios construct narratives and in how they manage to sell their wares worldwide. And, of course, there are the potential profits to be made.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?