Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Signing, dating and keeping a record of a paper contract are standard practice ' afterthoughts most of the time. However, that standard practice does not easily translate to online legal agreements ' those that are native to websites, mobile apps and other digital platforms, and use such language as “Terms of Use,” “Terms of Service,” “Privacy Policies” and disclaimers. How are those agreements presented on your website or your that of your client? How are those agreements accepted? How do you track who is agreeing to what and when they agreed?
The answers to these questions can make or break the enforceability of even the best-drafted agreements ' a problem that has plagued companies like Zappos.com, Overstock.com and TransUnion. Lawyers who routinely prepare online legal agreements stop short of providing complete and adequate legal services when they deliver these agreements and collect their fees without advising on the ongoing management, tracking and enforceable implementation of those agreements. However, lawyers can no longer plead ignorance when it comes to the technical implementation and management of the agreements they provide ' it borders on malpractice to do so. If an agreement is not enforceable, why even have one in place at all? This article discusses ways in which lawyers can advise clients how to implement and manage their online legal agreements ' both browsewrap and clickwrap varieties ' to maximize enforceability.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.