Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Signing, dating and keeping a record of a paper contract are standard practice ' afterthoughts most of the time. However, that standard practice does not easily translate to online legal agreements ' those that are native to websites, mobile apps and other digital platforms, and use such language as “Terms of Use,” “Terms of Service,” “Privacy Policies” and disclaimers. How are those agreements presented on your website or your that of your client? How are those agreements accepted? How do you track who is agreeing to what and when they agreed?
The answers to these questions can make or break the enforceability of even the best-drafted agreements ' a problem that has plagued companies like Zappos.com, Overstock.com and TransUnion. Lawyers who routinely prepare online legal agreements stop short of providing complete and adequate legal services when they deliver these agreements and collect their fees without advising on the ongoing management, tracking and enforceable implementation of those agreements. However, lawyers can no longer plead ignorance when it comes to the technical implementation and management of the agreements they provide ' it borders on malpractice to do so. If an agreement is not enforceable, why even have one in place at all? This article discusses ways in which lawyers can advise clients how to implement and manage their online legal agreements ' both browsewrap and clickwrap varieties ' to maximize enforceability.
Clickwrap vs. Browsewrap Online Legal Agreements
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?