Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
CONNECTICUT
Attorney Sentenced in Mortgage Fraud Scheme
A West Hartford, CT, lawyer who took part in a $3.5 million mortgage fraud scheme has been sentenced to a year and a day in federal prison, followed by five years of supervised release, according to federal prosecutors.
Gabriel R. “Gabe” Serrano was sentenced May 8 by U.S. District Judge Alvin W. Thompson. Serrano had previously pleaded guilty last August to one count of conspiracy to commit mail and bank fraud, a charge that carries a maximum prison term of 30 years, and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, a charge that carries a sentence of up to 10 years. His law license has been suspended since late 2013.
According to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Connecticut, from June 2005 to at least November 2008, Serrano was involved in a conspiracy that involved straw borrowers, false mortgage applications, false Housing and Urban Development (HUD) forms, fraudulent down payments, and false verification forms for the purchase of more than 50 houses in Hartford, New Haven and Middlesex counties. Prosecutors say Serrano served as the closing attorney on at least 24 fraudulent transactions. Specifically, he served as the closing attorney when a co-conspirator purchased properties with financing from private lenders. Later, when the co-conspirator sold many of the properties, Serrano usually represented the buyer. Authorities said that Serrano knew that his accomplice, and not the buyer, had provided the down payment money. In this way, contrary to what Serrano led mortgage lenders to believe, the buyers were purchasing properties with no down payment funds of their own. In the course of many of the fraudulent closings, Serrano received mortgage proceeds from banks and mortgage lenders. ' Christian Nolan, The Connecticut Law Tribune
'
CONNECTICUT
Attorney Sentenced in Mortgage Fraud Scheme
A West Hartford, CT, lawyer who took part in a $3.5 million mortgage fraud scheme has been sentenced to a year and a day in federal prison, followed by five years of supervised release, according to federal prosecutors.
Gabriel R. “Gabe” Serrano was sentenced May 8 by U.S. District Judge
According to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Connecticut, from June 2005 to at least November 2008, Serrano was involved in a conspiracy that involved straw borrowers, false mortgage applications, false Housing and Urban Development (HUD) forms, fraudulent down payments, and false verification forms for the purchase of more than 50 houses in Hartford, New Haven and Middlesex counties. Prosecutors say Serrano served as the closing attorney on at least 24 fraudulent transactions. Specifically, he served as the closing attorney when a co-conspirator purchased properties with financing from private lenders. Later, when the co-conspirator sold many of the properties, Serrano usually represented the buyer. Authorities said that Serrano knew that his accomplice, and not the buyer, had provided the down payment money. In this way, contrary to what Serrano led mortgage lenders to believe, the buyers were purchasing properties with no down payment funds of their own. In the course of many of the fraudulent closings, Serrano received mortgage proceeds from banks and mortgage lenders. ' Christian Nolan, The Connecticut Law Tribune
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.