Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is set to hear argument en banc, in Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc., No. 14-1617 (Fed. Cir., Apr. 14 2015), a case involving two critical aspects of patent exhaustion. As an indication of the importance of the issues, the court ordered the en banc hearing sua sponte after oral argument but before any decision, rather than at the request of a litigant for rehearing after a panel decision.
The appeal raises two issues: 1) whether a patentee may condition domestic sale of a patented article conditioned upon a use restriction; and 2) whether sale of a patented article abroad exhausts all patent rights in the event the article is later imported into the United States.
Case Background
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?