Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Navigating Triangular Setoff Through Safe Harbors

By Jeff J. Friedman and John J. Ramirez
June 02, 2015

Section 553(a) of the Bankruptcy Code preserves a creditor's prepetition right to setoff. Courts have strictly construed Section 553(a) to limit the preservation of setoff rights to claims and debts that arose prior to the commencement of the debtor's bankruptcy case. Courts have also strictly construed the mutuality requirement in Section 553(a) to require that debts be due to and from the same two parties in the same legal capacities. This construction has been routinely held to prevent what has been labeled as “triangular setoff” with respect to a debtor in bankruptcy.

Virtually all definitions of setoff provide for the netting of debts or claims and counterclaims between the same two parties acting in the same legal capacities. What is typically meant by the term “triangular setoff” is a contractual agreement where the debtor has agreed that a debt owed to the debtor by party A, can be applied to satisfy a debt owed by the debtor to party B. As one court observed, “outside of the bankruptcy context, ' [such a triangular setoff provision] without a question is [] valid and enforceable ' .” In re Lehman Brothers Inc., 458 B.R. 134, 139 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011) ( Lehman/UBS ).

The SemCrude Decision

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?