Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Renewal Options and Lapse of Notice

By David P. Resnick and Emily Mannix-Slobig
June 02, 2015

More often than not, commercial lease renewals are reliant on clerical diligence by the tenant. Option notices are commonly required to be delivered in specific formats within designated time periods. Attention to long-term detail is critical, for a failure by a tenant to properly and timely exercise its renewal option may be beneficial to the landlord and catastrophic for the tenant. However, a failure by the tenant to timely deliver valid notice does not always leave the tenant without options. In some jurisdictions, judicial equitable relief may be available to validate the renewal notwithstanding the failure to notify in accordance with the lease.

The Greater Park City Co. Case

The recent, highly publicized case of Greater Park City Co., et al v. United Park City Mines, et al. (2014), Third Judicial District, Summit County, UT, Case No. 120500157, explored this very issue. In this case, a tenant under a long-term lease failed to timely exercise a renewal option due to a clerical error, and sued the landlord, claiming that, notwithstanding its failure to comply strictly with the lease terms, it was entitled to the benefit of the renewal based upon certain long-established equitable principles under Utah law. Ultimately, the tenant was unsuccessful in persuading the court. This article examines Greater Park City and the arguments made by the tenant to the court.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.