Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
There is a moment in the modern Christmas film classic “Elf” in which the titular character, a full-grown man who believes himself to be an elf from the North Pole, enters a seemingly run-of-the-mill coffee shop in New York City after passing what most would consider a forgettable neon sign on the facade of an equally forgettable storefront boasting “world's best cup of coffee.” The “elf” runs into the shop and excitedly shouts to everyone in the shop, “You did it! Congratulations! World's best cup of coffee! Great job everybody!” The employees and patrons in the shop simply gaze at the display of enthusiasm with befuddled expressions.
Although this moment in the film is likely intended to show the viewer the comic extent of the character's naivet', it perhaps unwittingly provides a perfect demonstration of the precarious relationship between a company's boasting and the potential impact on those to whom it crows. In the parlance of the law, communication of this type has come to be known as “puffery.” The word “puffery” is a gem of the judicial lexicon. It is one of those rare words that holds enough legal significance to bring down major corporations, but sounds altogether silly when used in conversation. The brilliance of it lies in the fact that its silliness makes it a unique word, ripe for molding through the legal process.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.