Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
While the convergence of legal management and enterprise governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) is not new, more recent efforts to manage this development through integrated technology are fast becoming a strategic imperative. This still relatively young area of focus is already showing significant potential to help corporations better manage the risk exposure and compliance concerns that have drained so much time and finances in the past. For the intersection of legal and GRC to be fully realized, these functions must work collaboratively to define how these areas interact in holistic terms, ensuring that the overlap between the legal function and GRC tasks (e.g., assessing and prioritizing risk, creating policies in response to a new regulation, or handling a compliance incident) can be tackled effectively and efficiently to the benefit of the enterprise.
Pressures on legal organizations to reduce costs, keep up with regulatory complexity, and serve a global client base have steadily increased in recent years. Between 2012 and 2014, a growing need to control legal costs led corporate legal departments to nearly double the percentage of their budgets allocated to outsourcing work to non-law firm vendors, according to a 2014 survey of chief legal officers from Altman Weil. By 2020, according to some estimates, the share of U.S .and UK corporates expected to be using legal process outsourcing could reach as high as 75%. At the same time, in-house counsel regard regulatory issues as the number-one litigation threat, according to a 2013 study by Grant Thornton. The complexity of these efforts is compounded by the need for large organizations to operate on a global scale, managing processes, spend, compliance, and risk across international borders.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.