Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Court to Decide if Med Mal Policy Survives Doctor's Fraud
The New Jersey Supreme Court heard arguments April 27 over whether a medical malpractice carrier must provide the minimum of coverage for a physician being sued, even though he made false statements on his application for a policy.
A lawyer representing one such carrier, the Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Association (JUA) of Rhode Island, asked the court to overturn an appeals court ruling that required coverage for podiatrist Sean Stoddard. He owned the Center for Foot & Ankle Care in Toms River and Lakewood, NJ, and told the carrier when he applied that he met the requirement that 51% of his patients were from Rhode Island when, in fact, they were not, according to court documents.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.