Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Recent comments by Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Daniel Gallagher were noteworthy for both their candor and the subject he raised. On June 18, 2015, Gallagher wrote in a statement placed on the SEC website (http://tinyurl.com/nnatjpw) that the SEC was sending a “troubling message”: Chief compliance officers (CCOs) should not take ownership of their firm's compliance policies and procedures, lest they be held accountable for conduct that is not really their responsibility. He explained his dissents in two recent Enforcement actions brought by the SEC against CCOs and derided as not a “model of clarity” an SEC rule that requires investment advisers to adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations of laws and regulations. He also expressed concern that the SEC's current approach would actually disincentivize a vigorous compliance function at investment advisers.
The Two Recent SEC Cases Referenced by Gallagher
The two recent Enforcement actions referenced by Commissioner Gallagher, who is leaving the SEC soon, are worth exploring. The first case cited involved BlackRock Advisers, a registered investment advisory firm with approximately $452'billion assets under management. According to the SEC, BlackRock first knew of and approved an investment of $50 million into the company made by Daniel Rice III, who was the general partner of Rice Energy, a family owned-and-operated oil and natural gas company; and second, a joint venture that Rice Energy later formed with a publicly traded coal company. It eventually became the largest holding (almost 10%) in the $1.7 billion BlackRock Energy & Resources Portfolio, the largest Rice-managed fund.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.