Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
District Court Refuses to Disrupt Employer's Hiring Decision
Discrimination claims based upon an employer's failure to promote or hire remain among the more difficult claims for employees. As discussed in the recent case of Nunn v. NHS Human Services, No. 13-cv-3140, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74176 (E.D. Pa. June 9, 2015), in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, employees seeking to demonstrate discriminatory animus must demonstrate both comparable qualifications to the selected candidate and pretext in the decision-making process.
Restructured HR Department
Sabrina Nunn, an African-American female, had worked for NHS Human Services Inc. for about 18 months when, in mid-2010, the company announced that it would be restructuring its human resources department, according to the opinion. At the time, Nunn was working for NHS as its corporate senior director for HR information systems/HR projects. In that role, she primarily managed NHS's HRIS system (Kronos). She supervised two employees. Before joining NHS, Nunn had worked for 14 years for various companies ' primarily managing HRIS systems. Nunn's final pre-reorganization evaluation was overall “superior” ' with the caveat that she had “issues with teambuilding” and in her “interpersonal skills,” the opinion said.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.