Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This summer, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, 791 F.3d 376 (2d. 2015), an important decision concerning whether Fox's unpaid interns were “employees” under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law (collectively, the FLSA) and, therefore, entitled to recover minimum wage, plus time-and-a-half for overtime, for the periods they worked at Fox.
The Second Circuit reversed the lower court's decision that Fox's interns were employees under the FLSA. Media coverage characterized the Second Circuit's decision as a decisive victory for employers and a defeat for interns. But don't believe the hype. The Second Circuit held that the lower court applied the wrong test for determining whether interns are exempt from the FLSA and remanded the case to be decided under a different ' but not necessarily more lenient ' test. The Second Circuit's decision, moreover, stands out as the only significant decision addressing this important topic, newly imposes important educational requirements upon exempt internship programs and will flunk many internship programs.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.