Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When responding to e-discovery events such as audits or potential litigation, the cost of persisting with older, traditional methods for key parts of the process can nearly bankrupt a company. Modern archiving technologies that consolidate and proactively store content in a single “search-ready” repository are now playing a crucial role within next generation 2.0 e-discovery processes. They not only put an internal legal department in the best position to respond to e-discovery events, but also dramatically reduce the time, effort and cost of searching, reviewing and producing relevant electronic communications of all types.
This article covers why leveraging the benefits of archiving is an essential component of next generation 2.0 e-discovery methods when e-mail, text, instant messages, and a vast array of new and unique social media content types are involved, as well as what the future holds for this part of the e-discovery landscape.
Situational Overview
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.