Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<b<<i>In the Spotlight:</i></b> Cumulative CAM Caps
CAM caps are evil ' not in the traditional sense of Lex Luthor or the Joker, but inasmuch as evil can exist in a lease, it is inherent in a CAM cap. I know, I know ' yet another overly dramatic landlord's counsel whining about how the national tenants bludgeon him in lease negotiations. Perhaps, but a triple net lease is, by definition, intended to reimburse the landlord for all expenses in addition to minimum rent. Such a position, however, would make this article very short, and thus, the soap box remains in the trunk of the car for future lease negotiations. Indeed, a CAM cap, if cumulative and properly drafted and negotiated, can provide a practical and efficient compromise for the common struggle between landlords and tenants in negotiating CAM clauses.
Background
Each party to a lease goes into the deal with a predetermined budget. The tenant projects its sales over the life of the term of the lease, and weighs them against costs of operation, which include CAM costs. Likewise, the landlord projects its expenses over the term, including CAM costs, and weighs them against the fixed (theoretically) income from minimum rent. The parties can negotiate the minimum rent and can rely on the wisdom of elected officials to limit taxes, but CAM costs fluctuate and neither party can truly control them. Additionally, CAM costs by their nature are the product of competing interests for both parties. The landlord will likely seek to create a high-end retail environment with upscale services, but does not want to overspend, absorb unrecoverable costs or deter potential tenants with high CAM cost estimates. The tenant wants the project to be shiny and clean and in excellent condition, but does not want to reduce its profit by paying excessive expenses. Fixing CAM costs can impose too much risk on the landlord, and allowing a full pass-through of CAM costs can impose too much risk on the tenant.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?