Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
September 02, 2015

SWITZERLAND

New Round of Banks Reach Resolution Under DOJ's Swiss Bank Program

On Aug. 6, 2015, three additional Swiss banks reached agreements through the Department of Justice (DOJ) Swiss Bank Program, first announced in 2013. The program, aimed at preventing offshore tax evasion, gives Swiss banks the opportunity to resolve potential United States criminal charges ' specifically tax related offenses ' by entering into a non-prosecution agreement. Before a bank is afforded such protection, it must: 1) agree to fully disclose all cross-border activities; 2) provide details on accounts owned by U.S. taxpayers; 3) cooperate with all treaty requests for account information; 4) deliver information about other banks that are transferring funds to secret accounts; 5) agree to close all accounts for those account holders that do not comply with U.S. reporting laws; and 6) pay all applicable penalties.

The three most recent banks ' Privatbank Reichmuth & Co. SA, Banque Cantonale du Jura SA, and Banca Intermobiliare di Investimenti e Gestioni (Suisse) ' permitted “insurance wrapped” accounts (where the owner funds an insurance policy with assets in undeclared accounts), transferred money from banks under investigation to new accounts to avoid U.S. detection, and held mail related to the accounts on behalf of U.S. taxpayers to prevent disclosure to authorities. Richard Weber, Chief of IRS-Criminal Investigation remarked that these newest resolutions “emphasize the strength and stamina of the Swiss Bank Program” and the IRS Tax Division's continued dedication to “bring justice [to] those who would evade U.S. tax laws.”

'

SWITZERLAND

New Round of Banks Reach Resolution Under DOJ's Swiss Bank Program

On Aug. 6, 2015, three additional Swiss banks reached agreements through the Department of Justice (DOJ) Swiss Bank Program, first announced in 2013. The program, aimed at preventing offshore tax evasion, gives Swiss banks the opportunity to resolve potential United States criminal charges ' specifically tax related offenses ' by entering into a non-prosecution agreement. Before a bank is afforded such protection, it must: 1) agree to fully disclose all cross-border activities; 2) provide details on accounts owned by U.S. taxpayers; 3) cooperate with all treaty requests for account information; 4) deliver information about other banks that are transferring funds to secret accounts; 5) agree to close all accounts for those account holders that do not comply with U.S. reporting laws; and 6) pay all applicable penalties.

The three most recent banks ' Privatbank Reichmuth & Co. SA, Banque Cantonale du Jura SA, and Banca Intermobiliare di Investimenti e Gestioni (Suisse) ' permitted “insurance wrapped” accounts (where the owner funds an insurance policy with assets in undeclared accounts), transferred money from banks under investigation to new accounts to avoid U.S. detection, and held mail related to the accounts on behalf of U.S. taxpayers to prevent disclosure to authorities. Richard Weber, Chief of IRS-Criminal Investigation remarked that these newest resolutions “emphasize the strength and stamina of the Swiss Bank Program” and the IRS Tax Division's continued dedication to “bring justice [to] those who would evade U.S. tax laws.”

'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.