Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
SWITZERLAND
New Round of Banks Reach Resolution Under DOJ's Swiss Bank Program
On Aug. 6, 2015, three additional Swiss banks reached agreements through the Department of Justice (DOJ) Swiss Bank Program, first announced in 2013. The program, aimed at preventing offshore tax evasion, gives Swiss banks the opportunity to resolve potential United States criminal charges ' specifically tax related offenses ' by entering into a non-prosecution agreement. Before a bank is afforded such protection, it must: 1) agree to fully disclose all cross-border activities; 2) provide details on accounts owned by U.S. taxpayers; 3) cooperate with all treaty requests for account information; 4) deliver information about other banks that are transferring funds to secret accounts; 5) agree to close all accounts for those account holders that do not comply with U.S. reporting laws; and 6) pay all applicable penalties.
The three most recent banks ' Privatbank Reichmuth & Co. SA, Banque Cantonale du Jura SA, and Banca Intermobiliare di Investimenti e Gestioni (Suisse) ' permitted “insurance wrapped” accounts (where the owner funds an insurance policy with assets in undeclared accounts), transferred money from banks under investigation to new accounts to avoid U.S. detection, and held mail related to the accounts on behalf of U.S. taxpayers to prevent disclosure to authorities. Richard Weber, Chief of IRS-Criminal Investigation remarked that these newest resolutions “emphasize the strength and stamina of the Swiss Bank Program” and the IRS Tax Division's continued dedication to “bring justice [to] those who would evade U.S. tax laws.”
'
SWITZERLAND
New Round of Banks Reach Resolution Under DOJ's Swiss Bank Program
On Aug. 6, 2015, three additional Swiss banks reached agreements through the Department of Justice (DOJ) Swiss Bank Program, first announced in 2013. The program, aimed at preventing offshore tax evasion, gives Swiss banks the opportunity to resolve potential United States criminal charges ' specifically tax related offenses ' by entering into a non-prosecution agreement. Before a bank is afforded such protection, it must: 1) agree to fully disclose all cross-border activities; 2) provide details on accounts owned by U.S. taxpayers; 3) cooperate with all treaty requests for account information; 4) deliver information about other banks that are transferring funds to secret accounts; 5) agree to close all accounts for those account holders that do not comply with U.S. reporting laws; and 6) pay all applicable penalties.
The three most recent banks ' Privatbank Reichmuth & Co. SA, Banque Cantonale du Jura SA, and Banca Intermobiliare di Investimenti e Gestioni (Suisse) ' permitted “insurance wrapped” accounts (where the owner funds an insurance policy with assets in undeclared accounts), transferred money from banks under investigation to new accounts to avoid U.S. detection, and held mail related to the accounts on behalf of U.S. taxpayers to prevent disclosure to authorities. Richard Weber, Chief of IRS-Criminal Investigation remarked that these newest resolutions “emphasize the strength and stamina of the Swiss Bank Program” and the IRS Tax Division's continued dedication to “bring justice [to] those who would evade U.S. tax laws.”
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.