Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
'Missing' $20 Million at Issue in Lawyers' Divorce
A multimillion dollar divorce trial between two Southern California lawyers with Big Law credentials was set to kick off in early August in Los Angeles Superior Court. If pretrial filings are any indication, the proceedings promise to be more Hollywood drama than divorce court.
Hydee Feldstein, a former partner at Sullivan & Cromwell and Paul Hastings, will go up against husband Peter Gregora, a partner emeritus at Irell & Manella. Feldstein claims Gregora set up elaborate financial schemes to conceal and take control of the couple's joint assets, including investing almost $20 million in a hidden equity fund in Luxembourg. She says Gregora breached his fiduciary duties to her, which means she is entitled to all of the couple's millions in shared assets.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?