Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
'Missing' $20 Million at Issue in Lawyers' Divorce
A multimillion dollar divorce trial between two Southern California lawyers with Big Law credentials was set to kick off in early August in Los Angeles Superior Court. If pretrial filings are any indication, the proceedings promise to be more Hollywood drama than divorce court.
Hydee Feldstein, a former partner at Sullivan & Cromwell and Paul Hastings, will go up against husband Peter Gregora, a partner emeritus at Irell & Manella. Feldstein claims Gregora set up elaborate financial schemes to conceal and take control of the couple's joint assets, including investing almost $20 million in a hidden equity fund in Luxembourg. She says Gregora breached his fiduciary duties to her, which means she is entitled to all of the couple's millions in shared assets.
Feldstein specialized in bankruptcy and leveraged lending law throughout her legal career, raising the question of how a financial attorney with almost 30 years of experience could lose track of $20 million. Feldstein's lawyers say she was “naive and trusting” during her marriage, and fell prey to her husband's sophisticated financial cunning.
Gregora, who specializes in corporate tax, real estate and banking law, says his wife has no proof of her “outrageous allegations,” and suggests Feldstein has a history of making paranoid, unfounded accusations. In a pretrial brief, he says she has accused her former employers of tapping her phone, installing cameras in her house and plotting to kill her.
The couple had spent a combined $4.5 million in legal fees ' and that's before a single day of trial. Both sides blame the other for the enormous legal bills. “Hydee's 'scorched earth' litigation tactics have resulted in a devastating drain on the community's assets,” Gregora's lawyers wrote. Gregora's lawyers estimate the couple had accumulated a shared estate of $15 million, not including their $7.25 million home.
Gregora has retained Dennis Wasser, a Los Angeles divorce attorney known for representing high-profile clients such as Tom Cruise. Feldstein is represented by Christopher Rudd, a former partner at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips and Venable.
Both attorneys declined to talk publicly. Gregora and Feldstein met in June 1981 at Irell & Manella, where he was a partner and she was a summer associate. They started living together three years later when he was 37 and she was 25. The couple married in 1986, and Gregora filed for divorce in 2013. They have one adult son.
Gregora managed the couple's finances during the marriage, with his wife's permission, according to pretrial filings. Feldstein claims her husband secretly ferreted their money among dozens of bank accounts and investment funds, some overseas, in an effort to keep it from her. He invested $19.5 million in a Luxembourg fund managed by Versa Capital Management Inc., according to Feldstein's pretrial brief. Gregora maintains Feldstein's accusations are “preposterous,” and says dealing with her claims has been a “macabre game of 'Whack a Mole.'” ' Marisa Kendal, The Recorder
'
'Missing' $20 Million at Issue in Lawyers' Divorce
A multimillion dollar divorce trial between two Southern California lawyers with Big Law credentials was set to kick off in early August in Los Angeles Superior Court. If pretrial filings are any indication, the proceedings promise to be more Hollywood drama than divorce court.
Hydee Feldstein, a former partner at
Feldstein specialized in bankruptcy and leveraged lending law throughout her legal career, raising the question of how a financial attorney with almost 30 years of experience could lose track of $20 million. Feldstein's lawyers say she was “naive and trusting” during her marriage, and fell prey to her husband's sophisticated financial cunning.
Gregora, who specializes in corporate tax, real estate and banking law, says his wife has no proof of her “outrageous allegations,” and suggests Feldstein has a history of making paranoid, unfounded accusations. In a pretrial brief, he says she has accused her former employers of tapping her phone, installing cameras in her house and plotting to kill her.
The couple had spent a combined $4.5 million in legal fees ' and that's before a single day of trial. Both sides blame the other for the enormous legal bills. “Hydee's 'scorched earth' litigation tactics have resulted in a devastating drain on the community's assets,” Gregora's lawyers wrote. Gregora's lawyers estimate the couple had accumulated a shared estate of $15 million, not including their $7.25 million home.
Gregora has retained Dennis Wasser, a Los Angeles divorce attorney known for representing high-profile clients such as Tom Cruise. Feldstein is represented by Christopher Rudd, a former partner at
Both attorneys declined to talk publicly. Gregora and Feldstein met in June 1981 at
Gregora managed the couple's finances during the marriage, with his wife's permission, according to pretrial filings. Feldstein claims her husband secretly ferreted their money among dozens of bank accounts and investment funds, some overseas, in an effort to keep it from her. He invested $19.5 million in a Luxembourg fund managed by Versa Capital Management Inc., according to Feldstein's pretrial brief. Gregora maintains Feldstein's accusations are “preposterous,” and says dealing with her claims has been a “macabre game of 'Whack a Mole.'” ' Marisa Kendal, The Recorder
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.