Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FATCA's Due Diligence Expansion
In 2010, Congress enacted the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) in order to target U.S. taxpayers using offshore accounts to hide monies overseas. Although Congress' purpose and intent in passing FATCA was met, it has been achieved at a cost of imposing heavy burdens on those already compliant. The beauty of FATCA is that its grasp has no limits. That being said, FATCA poses new considerations for corporate counsel relating to their corporate clients and shareholders.
At the most general level, FATCA requires foreign financial institutions (FFI) to report to the IRS information about financial accounts held by U.S. taxpayers, or by foreign entities in which a U.S. taxpayer holds a substantial ownership interest. Thus, FATCA imposes a new system of information reporting and a new 30% withholding tax on withholdable payments made by U.S. persons and others to Foreign Financial Institutions (FFI) and certain Non-Foreign Financial Entities that do not meet specific reporting requirements.
It is crucial to remember that the withholding responsibility applies only to “withholdable payments.” Withholdable payments include U.S.-sourced dividends, rents, interest, royalties and compensation (also known as FDAP Income as defined in sections 871 and 881 of the Internal Revenue Code) to an FFI or NFFE, or credit payments of a similar type of income to an account held with the withholding agent. By 2017, the definition will be expanded to include gross proceeds from the sale, disposition, redemption, or repurchase of any property that produces U.S.-source interest or dividends.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.