Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Med Mal News

By ljnstaff | Law Journal Newsletters |
September 02, 2015

No Recourse for Doctor Claiming Defamation

Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Marsha Steinhardt ruled on July 17 that statements made by a physical therapist in preparation for a medical malpractice case being brought by a patient against a doctor (Yoshida v. Chin' 24149/2008) are absolutely privileged and cannot form the basis for the doctor's defamation claim against the physical therapist. The latter, Kwan Park, had signed a statement saying that the doctor used a power drill on the patient's injured shoulder, and that Kwan had held the patient down during this procedure. The doctor denied that these events ever happened, and claimed defamation. Justice Steinhardt, although conceding that the statement could harm the doctor's reputation and practice, nevertheless declared it off-limits as a basis for a defamation claim.

Insurer's Nondisclosure Requirements Fly in Face of GA Law

Georgia's Insurance Commissioner, Ralph Hudgens, issued a determination on July 15 that medical malpractice insurer MagMutual's nondisclosure agreements ' which prevent doctors and medical providers from discussing the terms of proposed medical malpractice insurance policies with others ' violate the state's Unfair Trade Practices Act by keeping potential insureds from obtaining valid advice from state-licensed insurance consultants. “The Legislature clearly intended for counselors to have an important role in this state's insurance marketplace,” Hudgens wrote in response to a complaint about MagMutual's policy, filed with his office in January. He deemed the gag rules “injurious to the insuring public,” and said that he intended to refer the matter to his agency's legal department for additional action consistent with his ruling.

'

No Recourse for Doctor Claiming Defamation

Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Marsha Steinhardt ruled on July 17 that statements made by a physical therapist in preparation for a medical malpractice case being brought by a patient against a doctor (Yoshida v. Chin' 24149/2008) are absolutely privileged and cannot form the basis for the doctor's defamation claim against the physical therapist. The latter, Kwan Park, had signed a statement saying that the doctor used a power drill on the patient's injured shoulder, and that Kwan had held the patient down during this procedure. The doctor denied that these events ever happened, and claimed defamation. Justice Steinhardt, although conceding that the statement could harm the doctor's reputation and practice, nevertheless declared it off-limits as a basis for a defamation claim.

Insurer's Nondisclosure Requirements Fly in Face of GA Law

Georgia's Insurance Commissioner, Ralph Hudgens, issued a determination on July 15 that medical malpractice insurer MagMutual's nondisclosure agreements ' which prevent doctors and medical providers from discussing the terms of proposed medical malpractice insurance policies with others ' violate the state's Unfair Trade Practices Act by keeping potential insureds from obtaining valid advice from state-licensed insurance consultants. “The Legislature clearly intended for counselors to have an important role in this state's insurance marketplace,” Hudgens wrote in response to a complaint about MagMutual's policy, filed with his office in January. He deemed the gag rules “injurious to the insuring public,” and said that he intended to refer the matter to his agency's legal department for additional action consistent with his ruling.

'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.