Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Lex Machina, a legal analytics company that grew out of a project run by Stanford University's law school and its computer science department, has published a 37-page “copyright litigation report” developed from litigation data and court decisions covering thousands of copyright cases filed in U.S. district courts over the past five years. The report analyzes key filings, findings, judgment types, decisions, resolutions, damages and other data.
The information may help entertainment counsel make more informed decisions on a broad range of legal and business issues that affect the industry. Lex Machina describes the report as the first comprehensive study of U.S. copyright litigation to provide a detailed analysis of different judicial districts, timing on trial and injunctions, and top parties and firms for marketing and outside counsel selection.
“As anyone who has ever done legal research knows, a good search eliminates noise, leaving one to focus on the relevant portion of the results,” Brian Howard, Lex Machina's legal data scientist and director of analytics, writes in the report's executive summary.
The copyright litigation report provides a snapshot of copyright litigation. Howard says attorneys will find it useful to see data on an aggregate level, but that users also may benefit from Lex Machina's legal analytics copyright platform, which allows them to customize data in ways that will enable attorneys to gain strategic insights.
The newly released report separates Internet file-sharing cases from other copyright litigation and focuses on them in a section at the end because, Howard explains, “the dynamics of these file-sharing cases differ significantly from other copyright litigation” and to combine them would have skewed the results.
Some of the insights gleaned from the data crunched by Lex Machina include:
Lisa Shuchman is a Reporter for Corporate Counsel magazine, an ALM sibling of Entertainment Law & Finance.
Lex Machina, a legal analytics company that grew out of a project run by Stanford University's law school and its computer science department, has published a 37-page “copyright litigation report” developed from litigation data and court decisions covering thousands of copyright cases filed in U.S. district courts over the past five years. The report analyzes key filings, findings, judgment types, decisions, resolutions, damages and other data.
The information may help entertainment counsel make more informed decisions on a broad range of legal and business issues that affect the industry. Lex Machina describes the report as the first comprehensive study of U.S. copyright litigation to provide a detailed analysis of different judicial districts, timing on trial and injunctions, and top parties and firms for marketing and outside counsel selection.
“As anyone who has ever done legal research knows, a good search eliminates noise, leaving one to focus on the relevant portion of the results,” Brian Howard, Lex Machina's legal data scientist and director of analytics, writes in the report's executive summary.
The copyright litigation report provides a snapshot of copyright litigation. Howard says attorneys will find it useful to see data on an aggregate level, but that users also may benefit from Lex Machina's legal analytics copyright platform, which allows them to customize data in ways that will enable attorneys to gain strategic insights.
The newly released report separates Internet file-sharing cases from other copyright litigation and focuses on them in a section at the end because, Howard explains, “the dynamics of these file-sharing cases differ significantly from other copyright litigation” and to combine them would have skewed the results.
Some of the insights gleaned from the data crunched by Lex Machina include:
Lisa Shuchman is a Reporter for Corporate Counsel magazine, an ALM sibling of Entertainment Law & Finance.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The business-law issue of whether and when a corporate defendant is considered distinct from its affiliated entities emerged on December 11 at the U.S. Supreme Court, with the justices confronting whether a non-defendant’s affiliate’s revenue can be part of a judge’s calculation of the monetary remedy for the corporate defendant’s infringement of a trademark.
The most forward-thinking companies embrace AI with complete confidence because they have created governance programs that serve as guardrails for this incredible new technology. Effective governance ensures AI consistently aligns with an organization’s best interests, safeguarding against potential risks while unlocking its full potential.
It’s time for our annual poll of experts on what they expect 2025 to bring in legal tech, including generative AI (of course), e-discovery, and more.
AI’s rapid market proliferation and regulatory expansion mirrors privacy’s, and businesses should model their contractual AI compliance on the successes of privacy law’s DPA and BAA.
Traditional keyword strategies and ranking tactics are losing ground to a more dynamic approach in which optimizing for search now means optimizing for every platform and user interaction. This evolution is appropriately being called “Search Everywhere Optimization.” The redefined SEO reflects how AI is not just changing how people find information but also how businesses need to think about visibility in an increasingly connected digital ecosystem.