<i>Versata v. SAP </i>: Definitions Are Now the Name of the Game

<i>Versata Development Group v. SAP America</i> was a closely watched case since it was the first appeal to the Federal Circuit of a Covered Business Methods review by the PTAB under Section 18 of the America Invents Act. This article addresses the court's reasoning regarding the definitions of a covered business method patent, and how that reasoning is at odds with norms of statutory construction, technological innovation, and claim drafting.

32 minute read September 02, 2015 at 12:00 AM
By
Robert R. Sachs
<i>Versata v. SAP </i>: Definitions Are Now the Name of the Game

Versata Development Group v. SAP America was a closely watched case since it was the first appeal to the Federal Circuit of a Covered Business Methods (CBM) review by the Patent Trials and Appeal Board (PTAB) under Section 18 of the America Invents Act (AIA).

This premium content is locked for The Intellectual Property Strategist subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN The Intellectual Property Strategist

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Subscribe Now

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

Beyond Workflows and Outputs: AI’s Impact On Strategic Planning

Law firms are at a variety of stages of AI strategy development, adoption and organizational maturity. While there are many important decisions being made on how to frame, structure, and evaluate these tools into legal practice, firm leaders are also considering the long-term impact on their firm’s business strategy.

May 31, 2026

Law Firms Have a Memory Problem Not a Selling Problem

The legal industry continues to treat business development as though it is primarily an attorney behavior issue. It is not. The firm absolutely has the expertise, but what it lacks is retrieval speed and accuracy.

May 31, 2026

Law Firms Don’t Have a Selling Problem, They Have a Memory Problem

The next real divide in the legal market is unlikely to be intelligence. The divide will be between institutions that can reliably retrieve and deploy what they already know and those that cannot. The firms that win will be the ones that can surface the right knowledge, in the right hands, before anyone else does.

May 31, 2026

Work-for-Hire Issue in Litigation Over 'Goosebumps' Musical

A current work-for-hire dispute over rights to the musical adaptation, cast album compositions and sheet music based on the children’s horror novel Goosebumps: Phantom of the Auditorium explores the inter-relationship of work-for-hire and copyright-ownership language in agreements signed both before and after the Goosebumps play was created.

May 31, 2026