Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Seventh Circuit: Wire Fraud and Bribery Conviction Upheld for County Director in Illinois
On Sept. 3, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld the conviction of Eugene Mullins, former Director of Public Affairs and Communications for Cook County, IL, and former Chicago police officer, who was convicted of three counts of wire fraud and four counts of bribery for steering government contracts in return for kickbacks. U.S. v. Mullins, No. 14-1701, 2015 WL 512856 (7th Cir. Sept. 3, 2015). Mullins was sentenced to 51 months in prison and was ordered to pay over $34,000 in restitution and forfeiture. In his appeal, Mullins challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, and cited prosecutorial misconduct. The Seventh Circuit affirmed.
As the Director of Public Affairs and Communications, Mullins was permitted to approve Cook County contracts valued at less than $25,000, while contracts above that amount were sent to the Board of Commissioners for authorization. As part of his scheme, Mullins, in his County position, helped vendors obtain professional and managerial service contracts, after which they performed no work, by submitting false documents to the County. The fraudulently awarded contracts included a disaster relief contract, an energy grant contract, and two census contracts. In return, Mullins collected nearly $35,000 in bribes. At trial, numerous employees testified that it was County policy to pay the selected vendor only when the work had been completed, a procedure not followed by Mullins. Moreover, to avoid prosecution, several co-defendants and vendors who had been awarded contracts all testified to instances where Mullins demanded thousands of dollars in cash for alleged payments to an unidentified “subcontractor.” These improper payments, it was later discovered, were pocketed by Mullins. In return for their testimony, each of the four vendors were placed on probation and ordered to pay full restitution to Cook County.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.