Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Statute Mandating Communication with Patient Gives Her No Standing to Sue
A court in Hartford, CT, has determined that, although under state law (Connecticut General Statutes (C.G.S.) ' 38a-503(c)), doctors are required to give patients information about the density of their breast tissue, a doctor's failure to do so does not give the patient a statutory cause of action against him. The plaintiff in Guiliano v. Jefferson Radiology alleged a breach of C.G.S. ' 38a-503(c) by her doctor, and she sought damages from him and his employer based on that breach. The defendants moved to strike, and the court complied with their request after finding that the statute did not establish a private right of action. The court did point out, however, that the plaintiff is free to re-plead to allege failure to communicate with her about her breast tissue density ' provided she does so without reference to the statute.
'
NY Hospitals: Don't Film Patients
The Greater New York Hospital Association ' an organization that represents almost all of New York City's largest hospitals ' recently sent a letter to its members requesting that they not permit filming of patients for television or other entertainment purposes without their prior consent. The move was prompted by the bad publicity that ensued when the widow and children of a former patient at New York Presbyterian Hospital learned while watching the true-life television show “NY Med” that their loved one's final agonized moments had been filmed and broadcast without their consent. They took their story to their city councilman and to The New York Times, which published an article profiling the case in January.
'
Statute Mandating Communication with Patient Gives Her No Standing to Sue
A court in Hartford, CT, has determined that, although under state law (
'
NY Hospitals: Don't Film Patients
The Greater
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.