Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The New York Legislature recently passed a bill essentially providing for a complete overhaul of the law in the State of New York pertaining to maintenance under Domestic Relations Law ' 236 and spousal support under Family Court Act ' 412. The legislation was signed into law by Governor Cuomo late last month. The new legislation provides, among other things, for: 1) modification of the current temporary maintenance statute; 2) the determination of the amount of post-divorce maintenance and spousal support based on specific formulas set forth in the statutes; 3) proposed guidelines for the duration of post-divorce maintenance awards based on the duration of the marriage; and 4) the elimination for purposes of equitable distribution of the enhanced earning capacity attributable to advanced degree and professional licenses and degrees for purposes of equitable distribution.
The Formula on Payor's Annual Income Up to $175,000
The proposed legislation provides that for purposes of determining maintenance, “income” shall mean income as defined under the Child Support Standards Act (Domestic Relations Law ' 240[1-b]; Family Court Act ' 413[1]) without subtracting maintenance paid to the spouse in the instant action or proceeding. The new bill provides for two sets of calculations based on the respective incomes of the parties. The calculations are applicable to a cap of the first $175,000 of the payor's income. The income cap is subject to adjustment every two years based on increases in the cost of living.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.